Thursday, September 24, 2009

Abomination!



Last Thursday, my Orientation to Art and Design class took a trip to the Minneapolis Institute of Art. We students were to choose at least three works of art that we could manipulate and combine, in the style of conceptual artist Fred Wilson, to convey our own message or concept. Of the works at the Minneapolis Institute of Art, I chose the following: The Buddha Amoghasiddhi (sculpture), a volcanic stone sculpture of Ganesha, Hiram Powers' marble bust of George Washington, and Georges Rouault's The Crucifixion (painting) which depicts the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. My idea is to set the bust of George Washington on a pedestal. The sculptures of Buddha and Ganesha would rest on pedestals that stand at least one foot lower than the pedestal that holds the bust of George Washington, on the left and the right sides of the bust. Both Buddha and Ganesha would be angled toward Washington. Rouault's painting of the crucified Christ would rest against the pedestal that holds the bust of George Washington. By positioning the works in this fashion, I would hope to achieve the notion that Washington embodies more power or importance than the religious figures that surround him. The concept I am trying to depict is not that Washington is just as important as any given religious icon, but that our world leaders are sometimes treated as if they possess holy, otherworldly, or divine powers. People often rest their lives in the hands of governmental heads, looking to them to answer their prayers. People are naive and uneducated and see a man, or...rarely...a woman, of power as a scapegoat JUST BECAUSE they have fallen into power.
It is likely that
your president, ambassador, governor, mayor, teacher, or boss will not clean up the messes you have made or fulfill your every wish so don't expect them to. In manipulating these works of art, I do not wish to remind people to keep the faith, but to take their lives into their own hands.



6 comments:

  1. Very smart.
    It makes perfect sense and it brings up a concept that I have never thought of before.
    Mona=Da bomb

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent work. Your idea is thoughtful and clearly explained.

    Interestingly enough, your concept is pretty clearly reflected in this bust of Washington, in which he is depicted as a cross between a Greek god and a Roman Senator. Soon after Washington's inauguration there were a lot of sculptures of him looking like a classical god, and - along with a discussion of whether he should have his office for life, like a king, a discussion of whether that was an appropriate depiction of the leader of a secular democratic republic. Pretty early on that kind of imagery got unfashionable, but there are some amazing examples of a "godlike" Washington out there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ps. My photograph of Ganesha keeps defaulting to a repeat of the photograph of Buddha. Lets all try and make believe that the Ganesha repeat is a photograph of Buddha. At least until I can fix it.

    Thanks for the feedback everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ps:

    Here is another godlike Washington example to check out:

    http://faculty.evansville.edu/rl29/art105/img/greenough_washington.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can compleatly dig your thoughs on this, And i like what you saying, Which may sound kind of funny considering my own post this week.

    I think both of our ideas on Washington surfacing for this project was perfect timing!

    The intence contrast between eachother is crazy, And i'm all about contrast of any sort, I like it Mona!

    ReplyDelete